Courage vs. “Courage” – The Colorado Gun Control Debate

May 1, 2014

By Laura Carno

Courage vs. “Courage” – The Colorado Gun Control Debate

California High School student Ben Wolman recently wrote an essay, for which he won an award in a Profiles in Courage contest, called “John Morse: Small Price to Pay.” Wolman and I have different definitions of “courage.”

Wolman paints then-Senate-President John Morse as an independent-minded legislator, concerned only about the safety of the citizens he serves, and not concerned at all about his political career.

The facts do not support this. First, the 2013 gun-control bill agenda was a much larger effort than just John Morse. Joe Biden was calling key Democrat holdouts during floor votes.  Michael Bloomberg and Governor John Hickenlooper were directly talking during these same debates.  And during the successful recall of John Morse, Bloomberg wrote a personal check for $350,000 to try to thwart the effort.

Wolman also writes that Morse “has a long record of making other people’s well-being a priority,” indicating that these gun control bills would actually make people safer. Unfortunately for Wolman, this is just not accurate. A recent Harvard study shows that strict gun control does not mean less crime.

True courage is the mom who stands between her children and an intruder with a loaded firearm rather than see her family harmed.  Courage is the widow who fights for concealed carry laws that would have allowed her husband to save his own life instead of being murdered in public by a stalker.

Politicians are not kings. They are not elected to jeopardize my safety. They are not elected to tell us what to do with our lives. They are not elected to tell us how we may or may not defend ourselves. Those who think they know better how we should live our lives should not be held up as heroes.

See the original post here.